The ethics of war and peace religious and secular perspectives edited by Terry Nardin
Publication details: Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press 1996Description: 286pagesISSN: 9780691058405Subject(s): War -- moral and ethical aspects -- congressDDC classification: 172 Summary: A superb introduction to the ethical aspects of war and peace, this collection of tightly integrated essays explores the reasons for waging war and for fighting with restraint as formulated in a diversity of ethical traditions, religious and secular. Beginning with the classic debate between political realism and natural law, this book seeks to expand the conversation by bringing in the voices of Judaism, Islam, Christian pacifism, and contemporary feminism. In so doing, it addresses a set of questions: How do the adherents to each viewpoint understand the ideas of war and peace? What attitudes toward war and peace are reflected in these understandings? What grounds for war, if any, are recognized within each perspective? What constraints apply to the conduct of war? Can these constraints be set aside in situations of extremityItem type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Annexe Office Annexe | 172 (Browse shelf (Opens below)) | Available | 2025-0068 |
Browsing Perbadanan Muzium Negeri Pahang shelves, Shelving location: Annexe Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Originated at a conference on The ethics of war and peace held in January 1993 at the Notre Dame of Jerusalem Center
Includes bibliographical references and index
A superb introduction to the ethical aspects of war and peace, this collection of tightly integrated essays explores the reasons for waging war and for fighting with restraint as formulated in a diversity of ethical traditions, religious and secular. Beginning with the classic debate between political realism and natural law, this book seeks to expand the conversation by bringing in the voices of Judaism, Islam, Christian pacifism, and contemporary feminism. In so doing, it addresses a set of questions: How do the adherents to each viewpoint understand the ideas of war and peace? What attitudes toward war and peace are reflected in these understandings? What grounds for war, if any, are recognized within each perspective? What constraints apply to the conduct of war? Can these constraints be set aside in situations of extremity
There are no comments on this title.